天知道

HD中字

主演:阿莉尔·霍尔姆斯,卡赖伯·兰德里·琼斯,Buddy Duress,内可罗

类型:电影地区:美国语言:英语年份:2014

欢迎安装高清版[一起看]电影APP

 非凡

缺集或无法播,更换其他线路.

 量子

缺集或无法播,更换其他线路.

 无尽

缺集或无法播,更换其他线路.

 优质

缺集或无法播,更换其他线路.

 剧照

天知道 剧照 NO.1天知道 剧照 NO.2天知道 剧照 NO.3天知道 剧照 NO.4天知道 剧照 NO.5天知道 剧照 NO.6天知道 剧照 NO.13天知道 剧照 NO.14天知道 剧照 NO.15天知道 剧照 NO.16天知道 剧照 NO.17天知道 剧照 NO.18

 剧情介绍

天知道电影免费高清在线观看全集。
  公园长凳、酒吧厕所、空屋废墟,纽约街头就是哈莉的家;只要一包白粉、一个针筒、一次注射,哈莉就可以上天堂。伊利亚的出现,为她无可救药的毒虫人生带来炙热光芒,然而血淋淋的窒息爱恋、无穷尽的毒品需求,耗损着两人世界,宛若急速冲向悬崖,狠狠坠地。爱与痛同源,没有模糊地带。这毁灭性的人生,唯有毒品可以证明自己存在。改编自女主角艾瑞儿荷姆斯的真实故事,导演萨弗迪兄弟在街头遇上无家可归的她,深受其戏剧化人生吸引,于是著手打造这部充满地下色彩与毒虫文化的电影。类纪录片的写实手法,古典与迷幻电音交相冲击,残酷而写实呈现一场致命爱恋。镜头从头到尾没有一丝喘息余地,被Indiewire 誉为是迷幻经典《梦之安魂曲》以来最好的一部类似题材影片。律政新人王II粤语成为伊丽莎白波纹棉花糖和云朵妈妈之福鼠送吉浊水漂流金毛犬段景柱你是哪里人人狼2018马拉多纳:庇佑之梦第一季铁娃 鐵娃我的魔镜男友单词聚会歌曲贝茨旅馆 第一季午夜狂奔国语加州靡情第一季生死相依冷战疑云第一季广岛别恋真爱狗公园回声 2006鲜花大战暗影龙卫斯嘉丽小姐和公爵第二季关中刀客之仁厨子学警雄心粤语版瓢虫少女第五季倒插门啊,朋友再见暴疯语晴空血战史狄仁杰之不死修罗我不能恋爱的女朋友狂野嘻哈梦黑天使1990调皮爸爸TV版国语通灵之战 第十五季你的管家波霸总动员2024多情的土地死神来了2六宅一生织物2018Star Twinkle 光之美少女和女儿的日常第一季大山深处110杰克·昂特维格唱K小鱼仙第二季

 长篇影评

 1 ) 65

曾经某刻,在谈及美国电影的意识形态之时,我指出了三个国家的电影人未曾拍出真实影像。但此处的“真实”仅就电影还原现实这一新现实主义所标示出的道路而言;因而招致了大家的误解,将我认定为一位口不择言之人。实则是冤枉。

此时此刻,《天知道》给了我一个辩白的机会,同时也提醒读者作者在尝试文学化表达之时,是不该作实证主义理解的。我想尤其指出的是《天知道》这部电影看似反驳了我在前面提出的观点,也即美国电影人未曾拍出过真实影像;实则是提供了观察这一问题的新方式。

《天知道》给予我们的就是一种异乎寻常的真实,已经脱离了新现实主义所开辟的语境。这种真实质感的获得不只在于电影聚集的是社会边缘人物的生活主题,这是通过对这些人物恋爱、吸毒、犯罪等一系列生活常态的刻画;还在于导演为获致这一真实质感所采用的方式。

借用一个比拟,我们可以将这部电影的镜头称为“望远镜式”的。它们是这样的镜头:深焦,近景(特写),背景的模糊化,以及晃动。因而观众如同举着一架望远镜将目光投向远方,看到了这些社会边缘的弱势群体挣扎的身影;会因为刀刃划开血管而不敢直视,会因为吸毒场面而坐立不安,会因为其自由地反抗着这个荒诞社会而欢欣鼓舞……

这是一类直接作用于我们感知的影像,如同那个在片名出来之后的长镜头,其伴随着配乐和镜头的自如移转导致的不可思议的观感,无不在提醒我们:我们需要这样的电影。

 2 ) 天知道

“莲花”台风正在小心翼翼地刮过。

小时候,总以为台风就是从台湾刮起来的,直到初中上地理课时,才明白台风原是离台湾更远的洋面,升成的一股强大飓风气流,迅雷而狂奔。

《军中乐园》那暴风骤雨的时代早已远去,如同一场远去的横逆台风,但问题还在,最终何去何从,是自然走向还是人为走向,都有待时间验证……

2015、7、10

日据时期的1938年,少女珠兰被父母送到山间一处封闭的学校。她的来到,渐渐发现诸多离奇之事。

惊恐与不安,时时困扰着她。一个个鲜活的生命离她远去。

原来这儿只不过是一间日军通过活人实验的实验室。

韩国导演李海英的《京城学校:消失的少女们》(2015),画面唯美、安静,对人物的心理刻画也极为细腻。只是美少女们的结局,令人伤感。

历史总有千千结,七十年前的战争,总有诸多故事可以呈现。想必这也是日韩关系难以彻底改善的原因之一吧。

2015.7.26

本・萨弗迪、约书亚·萨弗迪兄弟俩的《天知道》(2014),一部彻头彻尾的迷茫影像,如片中14岁女孩佛里,被麦克和伊里亚这两个流浪毒男缠绕着,开始还有一个爱情痴情症的红衣男,但他望而退却了。

流浪、毒品和歇斯底里相连,这是如纽约这样大都市不能见光的公开秘密。

其细腻如惨淡地佛里割腕后的丝丝疼痛,更多的是内心深处的哀嚎。

电影获得第27届东京国际电影节3项大奖“最佳影片、最佳导演及最佳男演员”。

算是一部尽人事尽心力之作。

2015、9、13

 3 ) 轻松打破观众对瘾君子的刻板单调印象

萨弗迪兄弟似乎摆脱了最初两部影片里的新浪潮影响:粗砺画面与晃动的摄影几乎消失,取而代之却是流畅的剪辑与声音技术,越来越有商业电影的味道。开头和结尾两场的耸动配乐最为明显,无对白的影像/画面具有先声夺人的力量,一种不安而可怖的气氛笼罩在这个边缘人故事的开端,而这种声音处理方式跟沙尔茨在《克利夏》的开篇有着相同的效果,不能不说是一种惊人的巧合。

这对兄弟导演依然钟情拍摄纽约边缘人题材,继之前的女贼和电影放映员,这部奠定影坛地位的作者电影将目光聚焦在瘾君子身上。要用“触目惊心”来形容拍摄对象才足以概括我的直观感受。尽管此前看过不少因吸毒而自甘堕落的题材,但这部现实主义色彩浓烈的作品更让人沮丧和慨叹。影片的阴暗基调跟阿伦诺夫斯基的《迷上瘾》不相伯仲,而跟《迷上瘾》里依靠眼花缭乱的(剪辑、摄影与配乐)技巧营造悲怆的手法不同,这部完全是依赖演员不加修饰的演绎。换个准确的说法,纯属角色自然流露的性格与气质所致。

女主角Arielle Holmes有过吸毒史,她后来写的《纽约疯狂爱情》讲的就是亲身经历,同时也是本片的改编来源。另外剧中不少演员或多或少有过不光彩的经历,如小偷小摸,进过监狱等。导演选用非职业演员给这个悲剧故事增添了难以置信的真实感,很多细节是职业演员难以演出来的,比如吸毒时的手部颤抖,脸部的抽搐表情等。而这种传统似乎可以追溯拉里·克拉克(Larry Clark),甚至是格斯·范·桑特早前部分作品。

除此之外,萨弗迪继续此前惯用的偷拍手段,演员的即兴台词也为影片增色不少,尤其是在大街上争吵,及女主角跟毒贩争执的场景。然而,相比前两部作品,这部缺少了一些奇思妙想的段落,也许导演认为类似的“幼稚”手法(巨型蚊子与漂浮在河面上的白熊)跟本片的论调格格不入。另一方面,剧本似乎要着力刻画的是这个依赖嗑药的边缘群体的日常现实,而非他们进入飘飘欲仙的幻觉世界。

为了细致刻画这个特殊群体的日常生活,导演不惜采用大量特写镜头来展示人物的脸部与身体,捕捉他们空洞呆滞的眼神,口齿不清的对白,进而增强故事的真实感。最令我意外的是,剧本里安排了女主角的一条爱情线,尽管最后以悲剧告终,但是这种处理手法一方面带来些许商业类型片的味道,另一方面,却也轻松打破观众心目中对瘾君子一直以来的刻板单调印象,有助于凸现这个边缘群体的实在感与悲剧本质。

很多时候,我们正常人感觉离这个边缘群体挺遥远的,即使在路上见到也会敬而远之。但看过影片后,又渐渐觉得他们其实跟正常人没太多分别。他们也是有七情六欲的真实个体,也会有正常的喜怒哀乐,只不过是个人选择生活方式不同而已。我认为,萨弗迪兄弟透过这个悲伤的爱情故事并非要揭示或批判什么社会现象,他们只是想展示纽约这个特殊人群的真实面貌,让更多观众了解到纽约最深刻的一面,远非是游客观光时见到的靓丽风景。

 4 ) addict of drugs

VENICE – The days of The Panic in Needle Park, to name one iconic New York City drug movie, seem long gone, now that most of Manhattan’s one-time junkie hangouts have been gentrified to within an inch of their lives. But in Heaven Knows What, Josh and Benny Safdie rescue that subculture from the invisible margins. They weave a small group of young heroin addicts into the fabric of the city streets with a grubby lyricism that’s visually intoxicating even if its emotional impact remains somewhat muted.
Following their detour into unconventional sports documentary with Lenny Cooke, the sibling filmmaker team returns to the scruffy aesthetic, raw authenticity and unstrung characters of their first feature, Daddy Longlegs.
Their new slice of life on the fringes is often hard to watch due to the pain, self-destructiveness and even the numbing Warholian monotony of the existences it depicts with a verite candor that owes much to John Cassavetes. But the film, which at times also recalls the lo-fi work of Gus Van Sant, is laced with moments of surprising poignancy, goofy low-key farce and even a weird kind of charm. It’s also distinguished by an intense screen-acting debut from Arielle Holmes, playing an unflinching version of herself and her own experience.
While the movie’s theatrical prospects are slim, the triple showcase of Venice, Toronto and New York Film Festival slots should help build a platform for VOD exposure.
Ronald Bronstein, memorable as the less-than-model parent in Daddy Longlegs, wrote the screenplay with Josh Safdie, based on Holmes’ unpublished memoir, Mad Love in New York City. She plays Harley, a homeless drug addict in an obsessive on-off relationship with Ilya (Caleb Landry Jones), whose nihilistic indifference extends to encouraging her suicidal impulses. That results in Harley slashing her wrist and landing in Bellevue in a mesmerizing sequence, played without dialogue and flooded with unsettling synth scoring.
Among the film’s most impressive qualities is the Safdie brothers’ boldly textural use of music — predominantly Isao Tomita‘s electronica versions of Debussy, but also a little Tangerine Dream and James Dashow, as well as some hardstyle and black metal.
The other standout element is Sean Price Williams‘ woozy cinematography, which hugs in close to the characters or sits back from a detached p.o.v., often shooting them in a bleached haze of light. They bleed into the visual field of sidewalks, storefronts, cars and pedestrians. This is not a portrait of New York’s junkie street subculture conveniently tucked into some skeevy pocket of the city. Instead they move freely, sometimes chafing against their surroundings, through libraries, Internet cafes, bookstores and fast-food joints.
The loose narrative tracks Harley’s half-hearted attempts to get by without Ilya. She brushes off the advances of abrasive Skully (rapper Necro) and slips into a friendship with Mike (Buddy Duress), an amusingly verbose dealer and fellow addict; he keeps her in smack but bristles when she can’t pay, his tenderness shifting to hostility.
While there’s a suggestion of a romantic triangle in Harley’s oscillations between Ilya and Mike, the Safdies are less interested in story or character than in immersing us in a milieu that most people would prefer to ignore. The film observes Harley and her cohorts “spanging,” street vernacular for begging, be it for spare change or subway entry; or stealing from a mailman’s bag, sifting through the contents for gift cards or cash.
A joyride on the motorcycle of Mike’s drug supplier Antoine (Benjamin Antoine Hampton) hints at momentary escape. But when the possibility of real deliverance surfaces via a hastily planned bus journey to Florida with the unpredictable Ilya, that notion is revealed to be an empty hope.
Heaven Knows What is a strange film, at once distancing and transfixing. If it’s not as impactful as it might have been considering the experiences portrayed, it has potent atmosphere and an admirable refusal to put any kind of gloss on the bleak reality of its limbo world. It also helps that Holmes, Jones and Duress, as well as the mainly non-actors in secondary roles, all inhabit their characters with real conviction.
Production companies: Iconoclast, Elara Pictures
Cast: Arielle Holmes, Caleb Landry Jones, Buddy Duress, Necro, Eleonore Hendricks, Yuri Pleskun, Benjamin Antoine Hampton, Diana Singh
Directors: Josh and Benny Safdie
Screenwriters: Ronald Bronstein, Josh Safdie, based on the novel, “Mad Love in New York City,” by Arielle Holmes
Producers: Oscar Boyson, Sebastian Bear-McClard
Executive producers: Charles-Marie Anthonioz, Mourad Belkeddar, Jean Duhamel, Nicolas Lhermitte
Director of photography: Sean Price Williams
Production designer: Audrey Tanner
Editors: Benny Safdie, Ronald Bronstein
Sales: ICM
No rating, 94 minutes.

http://tieba.baidu.com/p/3264279263

 5 ) drug story

Another film about junkies? That question almost inevitably follows one’s learning the subject of Josh and Benny Safdie’s New York-set drama “Heaven Knows What,” and its main implication is clear: heroin addiction is at once so limited and so overdone as a narrative premise that filmmakers approaching it need to have something new to say, or to show.



Watch Now

Unfortunately, the Safdies don’t. Their film is the latest in a long line of movies that seem to assume the milieu of addiction is justification enough for its existence. The result is a work that—like a whole sub-species of French films of the recent decades—fetishizes its own hyper-naturalistic visual style and performances (all but one by non-actors) while offering no original or striking insights into the world it portrays.

No doubt the film’s surface attractions and its core weaknesses both owe to its origins. Reportedly, the Safdies were researching a project in New York’s diamond district when they spotted a pretty young blonde who they assumed might be a Russian diamond worker. Turns out she was a heroin addict from New Jersey named Arielle Holmes who had a troubled romantic relationship with another addict named Ilya.

Fascinated by Holmes’ stories of her street life, the Safdies persuaded her to write an account of it, a manuscript that became the basis for their screenplay (co-written by Ronald Bronstein). With Holmes playing Harley, a character who apparently differs from herself in name only, the filmmakers shot in the neighborhoods she frequented using people she knew as secondary characters and hidden cameras to disguise their presence (a technique also employed in Oren Moverman’s forthcoming “Time Out of Mind,” about a New York homeless man).

The look, of course, is very close to that of a documentary, which raises the question: Why isn’t “Heaven Knows What” a documentary? If conveying the reality of junkie life was the main objective, that course might have been more productive. As in many other cases, turning real-life material into drama can produce an awkward hybrid: a film in which the reality is diluted by fictionalization, while the fiction is rendered thin and sometimes clichéd due to being shackled to its real-life origins.

So it is here. When we first see Harley, she’s in full hyperactive mode, threatening suicide to the long-haired, plainly doped-up Ilya (Caleb Landry Jones), who’s far more interested in the public computer he’s staring at. She’s so desperately in love that she wants to sacrifice her life for him. His groggy response: If you want to prove your love, go ahead and off yourself.

One gets the feeling this pathetic little melodrama among the drug-addled has been having a long run. Soon enough, though, Harley makes good on her morbid proposal, buying a razor at a bodega and cutting her wrist in a park with Ilya looking on. Whisked to a hospital, she’s left with only some nasty-looking stitches as proof of her love.

For a while thereafter, thankfully, Ilya disappears from her life and two other guys take his place. Skully (rapper Necro) is a burly dude in a baseball cap who offers to treat her well and help her out, though it seems like he might have other agendas as well. She, in any case, isn’t interested in being courted with kind behavior and rebuffs him.

Far more important is the relationship with Mike (Buddy Duress), who also seems to want to help her but is constantly exasperated by her neediness, unreliability and demands for both dope and credit. Unlike Skully, he evidences no romantic feelings for Harley—though he plainly despises Ilya, a point that becomes more important later in the story—but is nevertheless bound to her by their never-ending rounds of scoring, shooting up and finding places to crash.

Though the protagonists here end up in hospitals repeatedly, there are no doctors, therapists or social workers as characters. Nor are there parents, family members, non-junkie friends, police officers or similar. The film keeps its characters in a tightly circumscribed bubble of junkie-dom, and that’s one thing that makes it feel a bit phony, less a probing, realistic view of a complex milieu than one that partakes of the junkies’ own gauzy self-involvement as well as previous fictions’ oblique romanticizing of them.

Given the film’s relative weakness on the narrative level, its performances become all the more important, and here the news is largely good. For a first-timer, Holmes is amazingly assured and precise. Landry Jones’ mopey, narcissistic Ilya, meanwhile, is solid and convincing, though not as extraordinary as his turn in John Boorman’s “Queen and Country” earlier this year. The stand-out, though, is Buddy Duress’ Mike. Though it’s clear the reputed “street legend” is not an experienced actor, his work has a force and rough authenticity that make it edgily compelling, his mannerisms and vocal intonations sometimes recalling the young Elliott Gould.

A stand-out of another sort is the camerawork of Sean Price Williams. Using understated lighting, long lenses both outdoors and in close-quartered interiors, and near-constant re-framings, this gifted cinematographer turns in a bravura performance that fully realizes the naturalistic intent of the Safdies’ stylistic approach. That such verité-like verisimilitude can’t substitute for dramatic truth is an obvious truism, but Willliams’ sharp work offers its own elegant justifications.


http://www.rogerebert.com/reviews/heaven-knows-what-2015

 6 ) 新浪潮和自私性

创作上情节的真实无序(一切按照事件可能会发生的逻辑随机出现而不是围绕剧本要传达的某个意义)和角色真实外延(真正的毒虫也是unpredictable)相映成辉,完全的新浪潮风格,摄影和调度也有很多大胆/复古尝试,比如隔着火苗的长焦镜头表现烧人,大量的特写。 影片之外来说,毒虫就是极度自私和极简社会关系,而这恰好就是每个人的真实自我,或许这就是观众感动的原因,因为他们侧面看到了他们被社会扭曲的、从幼时就存有的关于自杀、偷窃、强暴/胁迫、欺骗的内心深处。 另外,Safdie兄弟活动影像出字幕的intro和outro也算招牌手段了。

 短评

独立电影的粗粝感谱写出病态的爱情故事,萨弗迪兄弟风格尽现。与《好时光》完全相反几乎要蹭到脸上的手持镜不同,《天知道》镜头始终与主角们保持一定距离,达到一种局外人的状态。火烧那段实在很癫狂了,可与《好时光》最后那个坠楼镜头一拼

7分钟前
  • Xaviera
  • 还行

诚挚。

12分钟前
  • Peter Cat
  • 推荐

异乎寻常的真实。没看过出片名后的那个长镜头,大概不可语2015年电影。

17分钟前
  • 把噗
  • 推荐

C+ / 《好时光》是彻底的迷幻药,《天知道》更像是半吊子的毒品。后者在努力兼容的爱与错乱的过程中反而显得有些单薄,前者汹涌的癫狂反而更显真实。开头结尾优秀,中间不足。要凸显颠沛流离中爱的神性反而失焦,开始文本逻辑构建后影像之力反而弱化。几个长镜头简直醉酒般飘逸又上帝般沉重。

19分钟前
  • 寒枝雀静
  • 推荐

它的难能可贵之处在于将一种地下手工作坊式的美学风格发挥到极致,横生出一种凛冽刻骨的真实性,无限贴近对生活的还原,同时又不矫揉造作。还有一点就是导演将整个故事的概念先抛出,展现毒虫们混沌的街区生活,真实而绝望,但又不乞求观众的怜悯同情,你也甭想从中获取到什么。

24分钟前
  • Jeannels
  • 推荐

她的讲述从划开手腕的血管开始,扮演自己的她和他们在纽约街头奔跑,游荡,相比其它电影中无休止的注射,交易,歇斯底里,她的故事里更多的是无聊和孤独,是清醒和失控之间最真实的生存和最坚韧的爱情。死亡是留至最后的神圣。他掷出的手机在她眼里绽放成烟花,他的消逝在她想象中不过是生命燃烧殆尽。

27分钟前
  • BLTEmpanada
  • 力荐

珍贵的人物状态,人物几乎不停歇的语音喷发和肢体躁动牵引镜头的追踪,构成人物状态的基底,并抹平剧作或结构上的痕迹,让人物能先于“表演”灵动起来,是为“迷幻”精髓所在,也是吸毒群体精神游离后回归肉体本能的隐喻。电子乐在维持形式感的同时间离共情,在叙述空白处引向“观看”以削弱摆拍造成违和的“虚假”感。

30分钟前
  • 花地
  • 力荐

As fucked up and beautiful as New York itself. 手机化作烟花真是神来之笔

34分钟前
  • 舌在足矣
  • 推荐

观感非常残暴的一部片。摧毁瘾君子的不仅仅是海洛因,还有两人之间病态、纠缠的爱情。但导演并没有用任何方式让角色变得善感,亦没有增加什么浪漫的成分,而是将电影带来的这种尖锐突兀的感受本身化为最激进的共情。不过依然没有解药没有出路,只有腐烂的生活和幻灭的自毁。

35分钟前
  • Lycidas
  • 推荐

卡萨维茨的皮,内里有卡拉克斯的烈味儿。导演兄弟俩在自己的方向上很成熟了,通篇怼脸上的镜头,自在的临场发挥气质,冷清又带着些许肉色的调色,介入感强烈。另外很贴近的写人,角色也并不单调(女主面对不同男人的态度抓取的好,但对毒贩剖白别有所爱的一场说辞勉强)。扔手机变烟花,唯一动情的描写

36分钟前
  • 左胸上的吸盘
  • 还行

爱你多一点,恨他少一点,感情完全抵消,残冷世界的平衡法则正如此般,只剩混沌如初的躯壳在不知疲倦地挣扎;疲软化人物与刺激剧情感正面交锋,糅合旋转自成黑洞,充斥着漫无边际的迷雾与电音,引人入胜也自知因果;本以为结尾会是一场成功的功能性交接,没想到却是一次巧妙的指鹿为马。

40分钟前
  • ChrisKirk
  • 推荐

一次又一次,我们看到卡萨维蒂对美国独立电影的影响。人物畅游在剪接细碎与镜头失稳的真实中,却时不时感觉到遁入情节剧式表演的状态抽离。这也只是皮相。从中看到无意识如何反抗观众的惯性显然更为珍贵,局部段落比迈克李微妙。

41分钟前
  • 迷宫中的站起来
  • 推荐

这是个什么烂片啊!!!我去 完全不能接受 ,一个词 病娇

43分钟前
  • 长腿爱德华
  • 很差

她和他在我眼里浪漫得不可救药。穿着帽衫的流浪汉毒瘾青年,恨你时想弄死你,爱你时在大街上亲吻乱搞,有情绪了就突然消失,不给理由。这才是特么的真实啊

44分钟前
  • 名字特别酷的人
  • 还行

直接,强烈。最后一幕绝妙,回到社区一切照旧,只是Harly坐在旁桌。影片最后的pov镜头拍出了disillusion。Ariel Pink的音乐大赞。个别的镜头设计有点二。

47分钟前
  • Lies and lies
  • 推荐

才华横溢且懂得控制(好不好另说)

49分钟前
  • 徐若风
  • 推荐

“我吸毒割腕偷东西,骗钱滥交爆粗口,天知道我是个好女孩~”纽约宝贝不断坠落,唯有真爱天知道,扔手机化做天边烟火

51分钟前
  • 丁一
  • 还行

终日游荡街头的瘾君子,在毒品面前一切都变得虚无、无意义,塑造的可怜可恨之人挺成功。

53分钟前
  • 帕拉
  • 还行

啟發至女主角的真實生活,吸毒成習,愛恨交纏,電影九成時間都被面孔佔據了畫面,透過零碎的鏡頭重組青春的死去活來。但。這不就是早期卡薩維蒂作品的風格嗎?(劇照都像極了<影子>),相似不是問題,素材剪裁不夠準確,音樂的運用更是讓人不解,只有瘋沒有愛,珠玉在前,作品也只成為別人的影子吧....

57分钟前
  • 何阿嵐
  • 还行

7.5 改编剧本的主角由原著作者本人来出演,我想剧组在当初选角的时候考虑的是她能够还原那份真实感,女主也确实做到了。很喜欢结尾的处理,它没有对剧本中的冲突给出解决,正如同这群流浪毒虫的现实生活一样,找不到出路。也很喜欢扔手机与烟火的剪辑,很有诗意。

58分钟前
  • JoshuaLi
  • 推荐